Home Up Strike Report Instructors Gallery Courses Favorite Links Feedback Articles Main Strike Bookshelf

The Strike Report - August 2007
 

QUOTE OF THE MONTH:

"Liberty is not government’s gift to man, it is the divine creator’s gift to mankind."  ~President George W. Bush~

Tactical Low Light Combat!
                           
Training and Equipment

 

The vast majority of violent encounters that law enforcement officers find themselves in occur at CQB (Close Quarter Battle) that is, ten yards and in with nearly 90 percent of those - at five to zero yards! They are explosive, savage, and happen within a blink of an eye. Additionally, as national statistics commonly reflect, nearly 70 percent of these incidents take place in reduced light situations. Remember criminals, like most predatory scavengers, are opportunists. Reduced light and shadows provide them the ideal environment not only to conceal themselves but to hide their actions as well. For the officer, it makes it difficult to determine how many there are or if they are armed. Therefore it is no wonder that darkness remains “The Eternal Enemy!”


So, armed with this information you would think most law enforcement agencies would be ahead of the game when it comes to tactical low light training, right? Not so! It is unfortunate but the bulk of tactical firearms training for most agencies occurs during daylight hours. By neglecting to provide adequate reduced light training an agency sets itself up for mission failure while also raising serious liability issues. The mission failure for the agency is twofold: first, it is failing to meet the tactical safety needs of the officers; second, failing the community which it serves should an officer become involved in an adverse shooting in reduced light. I would strongly recommend everyone look at some of the research and studies conducted by Tom Aveni, Police Policy Studies Council and Dr. Paul Michel (OD), LAPD Reserves in regards to these issues. I would also strongly recommend that 60% of overall firearms training should be dedicated to tactical low light: (flashlight and mounted light techniques under a variety of lighting conditions and tactics) and the other 40% dedicated to moving and shooting, multiple threats, target identification and decision making, malfunction drills and use of cover. Remember, low light conditions exist 24 – 7 for an officer. Deployment and use of tactical lighting could occur anytime or anywhere, at any moment!

 

As Tiger McKee of the Shootrite Firearms Academy pointedly states, “…low light conditions exist 24 hours a day. Step into one of the barns that surround the countryside of rural Alabama where I live. It's going to take a while for your eyes to adjust, making it difficult to see a snake lying in a corner, much less an attacker who's trying to hide. Urban environments are rife with dark structures. Then there are special circumstances like the New York City blackout of 2003. Even in situations where carrying a weapon isn't feasible, a light should be part of our gear - day and night.”

McKee is absolutely right in his assessment. There are two parts of his statement that tactically stands out and makes the most sense, “…low light conditions exist 24 hours a day.” and “…a light should be part of our gear – day and night.” Not only should an officer have this piece of equipment (tactical flashlight) but he should be training with it as well!

 

ATI: Asymmetric Tactical Illumination – This concept is worth knowing and understanding


Most military and law enforcement personnel have heard the term “Asymmetric Warfare.” It’s defined as: A military situation in which two belligerents of unequal power interact and attempt to take advantage of their opponents' weaknesses. Taking the word “asymmetric” by itself means: something that is typically off-center or created with an odd or mismatched number of disparate elements. It is out of balance.

Definition:

“When one opponent is capable of exercising superior use of his tactical weapon illumination systems and redundant components, combined with solid tactics which overwhelms and thoroughly dominates the opposing element in a reduced light environment.”

 

Breaking It Down:
 

  • The application of ATI in reduced light fighting is to create a total dominance overload against your opponent that disrupts and disorients them.
     

  • This is achieved by incorporating, with modern weapons, the technology of refined illumination systems. These systems can be for everyday operational needs, or they can be more mission specific: NV equipment, lasers, thermal imagining.
     

  • It is important to have redundant (backup) systems should primary systems fail. Secondary light systems to switch over to or by utilizing tactical flashlights with proper technique.
     

  • Using solid individual and team tactics through weapon manipulation techniques, light system discipline, applying low light principles and understanding night vision physiology.
     

  • Staying mission-focused / maintaining a combat mindset by adhering to the principle of “Accelerating the Tactical Loop.” Ret. M/Sgt. Paul Howe – CSAT – book: Leadership and Training for the Fight
     

“Accelerating the Tactical Loop” - This concept was first attributed to Col. John Boyd USAF: The key to victory is to be able to create situations wherein one can make appropriate decisions more quickly than one's opponent. There are four interrelated and overlapping processes through which one cycles continuously: OODA - “Boyd’s Cycle”

Observation: the collection of data by means of the senses
Orientation: the analysis and synthesis of data to form one's current mental perspective
Decision: the determination of a course of action based on one's current mental perspective
Action: the physical playing-out of decisions made


In other words OODA allows you to out guess, out think and out perform your opponent and do it in faster reference of time! “Accelerating the Tactical Loop!”
 

ATI - CONCLUSION:

It is the totality of all these elements that makes ATI – Asymmetric Tactical Illumination, which allows you to overwhelm and dominate your opponent in reduced light combat. To work, it requires equipment that can consistently perform to mission standards, solid tactics, great training and continuous practice.

Illumination Technology:
 

In today’s world, illumination technology has exploded on the scene and the choices available to officers are almost overwhelming. For law enforcement and military personnel that is good news. Some of the notable brand names for tactical illumination systems are: Surefire, Streamlight Pelican, Gerber, Pentagon, Night Ops, and Inova, to name a few. Each of these are excellent quality products from mounted type light systems for shoulder weapons and handguns, to the great small tactical lights with rear ignition systems. The choices are greater still from selecting bright incandescent flashlights to the spectacular LEDs! There are light systems and flashlights to meet the mission needs of any agency or military operation.

 

Prices, like the multitude of systems that are now available on the market, vary greatly. Remember this, “Any light is better than no light at all!” Figure out what you need and take the time to shop around. It is recommended to have multiple light sources to work with. The question you must ask yourself is, “In a gunfight at night what is your life worth?”


Mounted Light Systems for the Patrol Officer’s Handgun: YES or NO?
 

Some administrators and yes, even some firearm instructors are uncomfortable with the thought of their people carrying mounted light systems on the handgun. How do I know? Because I have personally been approached and asked about this issue from more than one person. One of the more common arguments I have heard is “What if they point their weapon at someone just to use the light system when no threat exists?” My answer? “If they are doing that, then what kind of low light firearms training program are you running and what kind of written policies do you have in place?” If you have officers doing something like that, then you as an administrator or as an instructor are not doing your job. To use that particular excuse as a concern not to allow your officers to carry mounted light systems shows a lack of tactical low light understanding as well as being misinformed. Most agencies have no problem letting SWAT, SRT or Narcotic Units carry these systems for their specialized work. Yet with the vast majority of police shootings clearly taking place in reduced light, why wouldn’t you allow your patrol officers to have the use of a great piece of tactical equipment, too? It is baffling to me that this should even be an argument. Like any piece of equipment issued to officers you must set certain expectations and parameters of use and then hold them to those standards. Having mounted light systems never precludes the fact that the officer still needs a handheld flashlight to work with in the field.


The advantages of a mounted light system like the Streamlight M3, TLR-2, or the Surefire X-200, just to name a few, provide an officer with great tactical illumination, allows him/her to shoot utilizing a strong two handed grip on the weapon which also means more control of the weapon, and the probability of better shot placement. Having a mounted light system integrated with the weapon and being able to use both hands to grip, is so much better than any of the combined techniques which use isometric support and it is also less fatiguing. For officers it means they have the tactical advantage over their opponent in a reduced light fight and that means ATI is working for them.
 

In fairness I admit there are some initial considerations which must be given if this is something an agency is planning to do. For example, a written policy should be implemented along with an adequate training program. A new holster will have to be considered that will accommodate the light systems or at the very least getting a tactical illumination carrier that mounts on the duty belt (but that means taking the light system on and off). At least with a duty belt carrier they can deploy and mount the light system as it is needed. As stated above, officers will still need a standard flashlight to work with and use in the field.

 

Conclusion

 

As stated at the beginning, the vast majority of violent encounters law enforcement officers find themselves in occur at CQB (Close Quarter Battle) that is, ten yards and in with nearly 90 percent of those - at five to zero yards! They are explosive, savage, and happen within a blink of an eye. Additionally, as national statistics commonly reflect, nearly 70 to 77 percent of these incidents take place in reduced light situations where stressors increase dramatically. Remember, criminals are opportunistic and darkness provides them with a certain amount of concealment that allows them to hide not only their actions but also make it extremely difficult to detect any weapons they have in their possession. Unfortunately, the bulk of tactical firearms training for most agencies occurs during the daylight hours and this is something that must change in the future.


Tactical low light firearms’ training is a critical skill that must be learned and practiced in order to stay proficient and competent. Good equipment coupled with physical and mental mindset, solid tactics and great training are the elements to ATI – Asymmetrical Tactical Illumination. Applying the total concept of ATI can make the difference between whether an officer survives a lethal low light encounter or becomes a national law enforcement statistic. Flashlights should be part of our everyday equipment. Why? Because in that 24-hour period of a day in an urban environment, officers will have to deal with reduced light, varying light intensities, reflective lighting and areas where total darkness exist. Having a tactical flashlight could mean the difference between living or dying.
 

Source References:

Tom Aveni ~ PPSC
Tiger McKee ~ Shootrite
Paul How ~ CSAT
James Yeager ~ Tactical Response
Ken J. Good ~ Strategos Intl.
Dr. Paul Michel ~ LAPD Rsv.
Strike Intl.

Jack C. Perritt
George F. Wiley

TOP GUN AT DALLAS!

The annual DPD “Top Gun – Shoot Off” was held July 26, 2007 at the FTC Range facility at 3200 Mountain Creek Pkwy. in Dallas, Texas.

It was an incredible day of highly advance tactical drills mixed with Alpha Dog personalities, and great competitive shooting by the top one percent shooters of the Dallas Police Department. Just to make the cut-off and be invited is an extraordinary accomplishment for these officers. All competitors and the range staff who put this show on are to be congratulated for making it such a great day. Also, a special thank you to all the sponsors who contributed such great gift prizes, food, drinks and other items. Well done all!

The three top shooters for this year were: Sgt. Gary Martin 1st, Richard Pederson 2nd, and Seth Rosenberg 3rd  - GREAT JOB GENTLEMEN!

Some of the prizes given away this year included: a Rock River AR-15, Sigarms pistols, EoTech, combat knives, boots, bags, T-shirts, folding knives, ammunition, plaques, scopes, binoculars, and …. lets just say everyone walked away with something. Thank you again, Range staff, for an outstanding show as usual.

 

Strike International would also like to commend the staff for the touching ceremony held for Jackie Doyal (deceased instructor) and for his family that attended. The permanent flag plaque dedicated to him was perfect.

Jack C. Perritt
George F. Wiley
Strike International
 

 

 

Home ] Up ] Strike Report ] Instructors ] Gallery ] Courses ] Favorite Links ] Feedback ] Articles Main ] Strike Bookshelf ]

Hit Counter  Copyright © 2011 Strike International, Inc.